论文部分内容阅读
我国刑法第四十八条第一款规定“:死刑只适用于罪行极其严重的犯罪分子。对于应当判处死刑的犯罪分子,如果不是必须立即执行的,可以判处死刑同时宣告缓期二年执行。”同时,《刑法修正案(八)》除了对死缓罪犯的减刑进行了更为严格的限制之外,对死刑的判决条件并未作出变更。对此,笔者认为,审判机关对判处死刑缓期二年执行案件的判决,根本没有选择权,即除了对符合条件的犯罪分子判处死刑缓期二年执行之外,审判机关别无其他刑罚可以选择。主要理由如下:一、对死缓适用实质条件的理论分析。
The first paragraph of Article 48 of the Criminal Law of China stipulates: “Death Penalty applies only to those criminals who commit extremely serious crimes. If criminal elements should be sentenced to death, they may be sentenced to death and suspended for two years if they are not immediately required to be executed. At the same time, ”Criminal Law Amendment (8)" has not changed the conditions of the death penalty except for the more restrictive restriction on the commutation of death penalty criminals. In this regard, the author believes that the judiciary has no choice whatsoever to adjudicate a sentence of execution of a two-year suspended sentence of death penalty. That is to say, except for the two-year suspension of sentenced to death by eligible criminals, there are no other penalties for the trial organ to choose from. The main reasons are as follows: First, the theoretical analysis of the substantive conditions for the application of restraint.