论文部分内容阅读
笔者《经典、传统与书法艺术的源泉》(载于《中国书法》二○○五年第七期,以下简称前文)一文发表后,一直期待看到回应文章,希望于先生有以教我。然读到载于《中国书法》二○○五年第九期《再论『经典、传统』与『临摹、采风』》(以下简称于文)后,却大失所望。于文殊少有基于学理探讨问题的诚意,行文为激烈情绪所控制。笔者深感错愕与不解。于此,谨就有关问题陈说如下,以就教于方家。
After I published my article “The Source of Classic, Traditional and Calligraphic Art” (contained in the “Chinese Calligraphy”, the seventh issue in 2005, hereinafter referred to as “the earlier article”), I have been looking forward to seeing the response articles and I hope Mr. Yu can teach me. However, it is disappointing to read that after it was read in the ninth issue of “Chinese Calligraphy” in 2005, “Revisiting the classic and traditional” and “copying and collecting the wind” (hereinafter referred to as the article). There are few sincerity in Wenshu based on probing into problems, and the essay is under the control of intense emotions. I am deeply amazed and puzzled. Here, I would like to say the following about the relevant issues in order to teach Yu Fang.