论文部分内容阅读
近年来 ,为了提高诉讼效率 ,合理配置司法资源 ,我国许多司法机关掀起了一股普通程序简易审改革的热潮。从实践情况来看 ,该项改革的确取得了一定的成效 ,但简易审改革从一开始就“先天不足” :一是简易审改革的法律依据不足 ;二是简易审的适用前提与基础于理不合 ;三是简易审改革在强调司法效率的同时并未照应到司法公正 ;四是提高诉讼效率的着眼点不能在本不该受到压缩的庭审方面大做文章 ;五是各地司法机关在改革过程中普遍存在“恣意造法”现象。
In recent years, in order to enhance the efficiency of litigation and allocate judicial resources reasonably, many judicial organs in our country have set off an upsurge of simplifying the reform of ordinary procedures. From a practical point of view, the reform has indeed achieved some results, but the reform of the simple review has been “innately inadequate” from the very beginning: First, the legal basis for simple review and reform is inadequate; second, the prerequisites and bases for simplifying the trial are not reasonable Thirdly, the simple review reform emphasizes the judicial efficiency while not responding to the judicial justice. Fourth, the focus of improving the efficiency of the proceedings can not make a big fuss in the hearing that should not be compressed. Fifth, the judicial organs in various regions in the reform process There is a widespread “wanton fabrication” phenomenon.