论文部分内容阅读
近年来,司法的“民主方面”越来越受到人们的关注,但“司法民主”作为一个独立的概念,并没有像诸如政治民主、财政民主、基层民主等概念那样获得普遍的认同,对于这一概念人们采取了极为谨慎的态度。要理解司法民主概念的理论价值,有必要理解司法的民主角色的转变和民主责任的加强。对于“司法民主化”的实践需求,须要注意的是,司法民主理论的合理性并不能直接证成司法民主化方法和手段的合理性。司法民主化实践存在着“过于”民主化的危险,从而使司法权丧失应有的权力制衡和居中裁判的功能。
In recent years, the “democratic aspect” of the judiciary has drawn more and more attention. However, as an independent concept, “judicial democracy” has not gained the universality of concepts such as political democracy, fiscal democracy and grassroots democracy Agree, take a very cautious attitude towards this concept. To understand the theoretical value of the concept of judicial democracy, it is necessary to understand the transformation of judicial democratic role and the strengthening of democratic responsibility. For the practical need of “judicial democratization”, it should be noticed that the rationality of the theory of judicial democracy can not directly justify the methods and means of judicial democratization. The practice of judicial democratization has the danger of democratization of “being too”, so that the judicial power should lose the due balance of powers and the function of centering the judgment.