今年以来,有的地方集体商业企业也仿照国营小型企业,实行了租赁经营。对此,有两种不同的看法:一种认为集体商业企业不宜搞租赁经营。理由是:第一,国营企业实行租赁经营,主要是解决国营企业的财产归国家所有、由国家直接经营带来的种种弊端。通过两权分离,调动企业和职工的经营积极性,而集体商业企业本身就是集体所有制性质,企业财产归集体所有,企业由集体经营,不存在所有权与经营权相分离的问题;第二,集体企业出租给集体经营,在理论上也说不通;第三,从中央到地方的有关文件上没有要求集体企业搞租 Since the beginning of this year, some local collective commercial enterprises have modeled themselves on small state-owned enterprises and have implemented leasing operations. In this regard, there are two different views: One is that collective commercial enterprises should not engage in leasing operations. The reasons are: First, state-owned enterprises implement leasing operations, mainly to solve the various drawbacks caused by the state-owned enterprises’ ownership of the state and the direct operation of the state. Through the separation of the two powers, the business enthusiasm of enterprises and employees is mobilized, and the collective commercial enterprise itself is the nature of collective ownership, the enterprise property is owned collectively, the enterprise is operated collectively, there is no problem of separation of ownership and management rights; second, the collective enterprise Renting to collective management is also theoretically unreasonable. Third, the relevant documents from the central government to the local government do not require collective enterprises to rent.