论文部分内容阅读
我国在制定民法典时,人身权法应该单独成编,并且名称定为《人身权法》而非《人格权法》。“人身权法”的名称是《民法通则》一直使用的概念,更为科学。人格权是包括主观层面的权利主体、权利能力及客观层面的人格利益三层含义,但人格权仅仅是人身权的一个组成部分。而人身权的范围要广于人格权。人身权不仅包括无相对人的人格利益,也包括产生于特定相对人之间的身体权和各种民事身份权。人格权不能包含诸多类似于荣誉权、社员权、执业资格身份权、信用权等不同种类的民事身份权和作为相对权的亲属权。制定独立的人身权法,是对民法通则立法经验的延续,契合民法的自身属性。也符合民事法学的发展趋势,最终与物权法、债权法、继承法等共同构成完善的民法法律体系。
When we formulate the civil code, the personal rights law should be compiled into a separate code, and the name is defined as “personal rights law” rather than “personality rights law.” “Personal rights law ” name is “Civil Law” has been the concept of using more scientific. The personality right includes the three levels of subjectivity, rights and objective personality, but personality right is only an integral part of personal rights. The scope of personal rights should be broader than personality rights. Personal rights include not only the personality benefits of non-relatives, but also the rights of bodily rights and various civil rights arising from certain relatives. Personality rights can not contain many different kinds of civil status rights such as honor rights, membership rights, professional qualifications, credit rights and relatives as relatives. The development of an independent personal rights law is a continuation of the legislative experience of the general principles of civil law and corresponds to the own attributes of civil law. Also in line with the development trend of civil jurisprudence, and ultimately with the property law, debt law, inheritance law together to form a sound legal system of civil law.