和明末清初的教育家颜元一样,梁启超把矛头指向了八股取士的科举制度,认为八股取士制度已然成为中国教育发展的一大障碍,成为禁锢中国人智慧的一大枷锁,但不同的是,梁启超不仅撰文“炮轰”八股取士的科举制度,更是明确提出了他的改革设想。教育其实是一种“收效纯在将来”的长远事业,是不可急功近利的,而教育的一个最为重要的功能就是能够“制造国民”,通过“制造国民”来改造国家。梁启超不仅具有高超的教学、演讲才能,也具有高尚的人格魅力和敬业精神,他也因此在当时的青年学子中极具影响力,他的学说也深深影响了一代人。 Like Yan Yuan, an educator in the late Ming and early Qing dynasties, Liang Qichao pointed his finger at the eight-legged examination system. He thought that the system of eight-person candidates has become a major obstacle to the development of education in China and a major obstacle to the wisdom of Chinese people. However, The difference is that Liang Qichao not only authored the imperial examination system of “bombarding” the eight-handed candidate, but also clearly put forward his vision of reform. Education is in fact a long-term undertaking that is “effective in the future.” Education is one of the most important functions of “making the nation” and “making the nation” to transform the country. Liang Qichao not only has superb teaching, speaking skills, but also has a noble personality and dedication, so he was so influential in the young students at that time, his theory has also deeply affected a generation.