论文部分内容阅读
调查2001年度《中国医学科学院学报》在中国知网、万方医学网和维普网的零被引率,结果分别为10.9%(19/175)、24.6%(43/175)和24.6%(43/175)。综合上述3个数据库的检索结果并进一步用Scopus数据库排除后,零被引率下降至8.0%(14/175)。14篇零被引文章中有综述1篇,论著7篇,经验交流1篇,病例报告2篇,简报1篇,摘要2篇。论著的基金比率为57.1%(4/7),均为国家级基金。综述和论著均为基础医学类文章,作者均为国内相关领域的知名专家。本研究结果提示,数据库的期刊收录范围可以影响期刊的零被引率,应慎重对待零被引论文。
To investigate the zero citing rate of Journal of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences in 2001, which was 10.9% (19/175), 24.6% (43/175) and 24.6% (43 / 175). Based on the results of the above three databases and further exclusion from the Scopus database, the zero citation rate dropped to 8.0% (14/175). A total of 14 articles cited in zero cited article 1, 7 articles, 1 experience exchange, case report 2, briefing 1 articles, 2 abstracts. The ratio of the fund is 57.1% (4/7), all of which are state-level funds. Reviews and treatises are basic medical articles, the authors are well-known experts in the field of related fields. The results of this study suggest that the coverage of journals in the database can affect the zero rate of the journals and should be treated with caution.