论文部分内容阅读
韩愈《毛颖传》并非是抒发作者有才而不能见用的感慨,或是揭露统治阶级的内部矛盾,而是曲折表达了韩愈对体现在官员致仕问题上的君臣之道的理解,在这个问题上,韩愈与白居易、裴度等人所代表的意见存在分歧,从中折射出元和士人政治态度的分殊。《毛颖传》通过微末之物模仿庄重之举产生俳谐意趣,这一笔法与中唐以至五代某些流行的文学观念存在冲突,因此对此文的批评基本上出现于这个时期,宋代以后,韩愈的地位受到充分尊重,对此文的评价转而以肯定为主。
Han Yu “Mao Ying Chuan” is not to express the writer’s talented and can not see with emotion, or expose the internal contradictions of the ruling class, but tortuous expression of Han Yu on the issue of officials cited in the monarch on the road to understanding, in this On the issue, there are differences between the views expressed by Han Yu and Bai Juyi and Pei Du, which reflects the distinction between the political attitudes of Yuan and Shi scholars. “Mao Ying Chuan” produced a harmonic interest through imitating the solemn act by the minor things, which conflicts with some popular literary concepts in the Middle and even the Five Dynasties. Therefore, the criticism of this article basically appeared in this period. After the Song Dynasty , Han Yu’s status has been fully respected, the evaluation of the text turned to be sure.