论文部分内容阅读
今年春夏,上海第二纺织机械厂被上海市作为深化企业改革的头号典型推出后,犹如一石击水,在企业界引起了巨大的震荡:不少人不以为然,认为二纺机进入良性循环,主要得益于优惠政策,有的厂长宣称:“给我二纺机一样的政策,我也能把企业搞活。”然而,当上海市政府在全市正式宣布,任何国营大中型企业,凡是愿意承担二纺机一样的风险,都可以享受二纺机一样的优惠政策时,戏剧性的事情发生了:不仅报名者寥寥,而且有的厂长报名后又宣告退出。 一时间,“二纺机现象”成了上海企业界的议论中心。
In the spring and summer of this year, after the Shanghai No. 2 Textile Machinery Plant was launched as the number one model for deepening corporate reform, it was like a stone hitting the water and causing great shocks in the corporate world. Many people disagreed and thought that the second textile machinery had entered a virtuous circle. Thanks to preferential policies, some factory managers declared: “Give me the same policy as the second textile machinery, and I can also invigorate the company.” However, when the Shanghai municipal government officially announced in the city that any state-owned large and medium-sized enterprises, who are willing to bear The same risk of the second textile machinery, can enjoy the same preferential policies as the second textile machinery, the dramatic thing happened: not only the applicants, but also some director announced the application after the withdrawal. For a time, the “second textile machinery phenomenon” has become the center of discussion in the Shanghai business community.