“苑”、“囿”的辨异,古代注家多为探究。或主有无墙之别。《淮南子·本经训》:“侈苑囿之大。”高诱注:“侈,广也。有墙曰苑,无墙日囿。”《汉书·高帝纪上》“故秦苑囿园池令民得田之”颜师古注:“养鸟兽曰苑,苑有垣曰囿。”则颜氏之解相反:以“苑”是无垣者。或主大小之异。《吕氏春秋·重己》:“昔先王之为苑囿园池也,足以观望劳形而已矣。”高诱注:“畜禽兽所,大曰苑,小曰囿。”或主畜兽与树果之分。《文选·班固<两都赋序>》“浚 The differences between the ”court“ and the ”determination“ are mostly explored in ancient times. Or does the Lord have walls? ”Huainanzi Benjingjian“: ”Luxury Court of the big. “ High inducement: ”Extraordinary, wide also. There is a wall 曰 Court, no wall 囿. “ ”Han Gao Di Ji on“ ”Qin Qinyuan Liyuan Chiling Mintian “ Yan Shigu Note: ”Yangyuan Beast Court, Yuan Youyi.“ The Yan’s solution is the opposite: the ”Yuan“ is Innocent people. Or the size of the main difference. ”Lu’s Spring and Autumn Period“: ”The king of the past is the court of the court. It is enough to watch the labor.“ ”High inducement:“ ”Livestock and beasts, Daddy Court, and the Little Princess.“ ”Or the distinction between the chief beast and the tree and the fruit. “Literary Selection Ban Gu