在舊中國的社會里,有些人由於長時期脫離社會實踐,不過問政治,把自然科学當作“超階級”、“超政治”的東西。這一類的錯誤思想在解放後的思想改造過程中,已經加以批判。但是殘餘的“純技术”觀點是不是已經被徹底糾正了呢,今天還值得我們加以檢查。同時,解放以後有不少的人,由於認識到自然科学也和藝術、哲学一樣,是一種社會意識形態,認識到階級斗争是貫穿在一切社會現象中的基本的斗争內容,因而把舊社會遺留丁来的科学技術籠統地看作“資產階級的科学”,盲目地加以反對。這兩種傾向,如果還存在於我們的思想意識中,那末我們對“自然科学有沒有階級性”這一個問題就有徹底加以澄清之必要,尤其當今天我們正朝着社會主義邁進,正需要大量的科学技術以從事 In the old Chinese society, some people, out of their social practice for a long time, asked politics and considered natural science as “super-class” and “super-political.” This kind of erroneous thinking has been criticized in the post-liberation reform of thought. But is not the residual “purely technical” view completely corrected? It is worth examining us today. At the same time, many people after the liberation realized that, like the arts and philosophy, natural science is also a social ideology. Recognizing that class struggle is the basic struggle that runs through all social phenomena, the legacy of the old society Ding’s science and technology are generally regarded as “bourgeois science” and blindly opposed. If these two tendencies still exist in our ideological consciousness, then we need to be thoroughly clarified on the issue of “whether or not there is any class nature in the natural sciences.” Especially when we are moving toward socialism today, we need a large number of Science and technology to engage