在去年的一篇文章中我说过,英国有句谚语,叫“不打破鸡蛋,就煎不出荷包蛋”,意思是“有得必有失”。这句话的确很有点哲理,尤其是对于读书学习。无独有偶。杜诗“读书破万卷,下笔如有神”也有类似的意趣。但是不知为什么,从前有的版本却刻成“读破万卷书。”这一字的颠倒,里面倒大有文章;且不去辨它谁正谁误罢,而孰优孰劣,却是一见眼明的。因为下联“下笔如有神”,是读万卷而有所“破”的结果。如果仅仅满足于“读破”万卷,那也不过是人家的学问,有学而无识,所谓两脚书架而已。这样恐怕做不到下笔如有神吧? 读书作文如此,学习搞科研又何独不然?开卷有益,读书当然首要在“读”。我不是反对读书,而且应该提倡博览群书;作为教师,更须引导学生很好地去读书。但不能仅仅着眼于“读破”万卷。所谓“韦编三绝”,精神固然可佳,可是读死书、死读书,十绝八绝也毕竟无济于事。因此,我以为这里的“破”, In an article last year, I said that there is a proverb in the United Kingdom that “if we do not break the eggs, we will not get the fried eggs,” meaning “there must be some losses.” This sentence is indeed a little philosophy, especially for studying. Coincidentally. Du Fu “study break rolls, pen if God” has a similar interest. But for some reason, some versions of the past were inscribed with the words “Reading broken books.” There was a huge upside down in the article; At a glance Because the second line “under the pen and if there is God,” read a few rolls and some “broken” results. If only satisfied with the “reading broken” rolls, it is only people’s knowledge, there is no knowledge, the so-called two bookshelf only. So I am afraid I can not write down if God? Reading essay so, learn to engage in scientific research and why not? Open-book useful, of course, primary reading “in reading.” I am not opposed to reading books, and should promote reading books; as teachers, but also to guide students to go to school well. But we can not just focus on “reading broken” rolls. The so-called “Wei series of three must,” although the spirit may be good, but read the books, dead books, absolutely must do nothing after all. Therefore, I think here “broken”