近年来,利益问题一直是思想政治工作学术界探讨的热点问题。但在研究过程中,人们不自觉地把利益就是经济利益,就是物质利益的判断作为理论研究的起点。由于利益、经济利益、物质利益,这三个概念的内涵和外延都有区别,所以,对利益问题的研究就容易产生偏差。例如,在研究市场经济条件下思想政治工作的地位时,有人认为既然利益是人的行为动因,那么只要发展经济,就可以满足人们的全部需要,思想政治工作就可以取消或替代。这样在一些地方就造成了“一手硬,一手软”。在研究如何调动人们的积极性时,往往只注意到物质利益的手段,而 In recent years, the issue of interest has always been a hot topic explored by academic circles in ideological and political work. However, in the process of research, people unconsciously regard the interests as economic benefits and the judgments of material interests as the starting point of theoretical research. Because the interests, economic interests, material interests, the connotation and extension of these three concepts are different, so the study of the issue of interest is prone to bias. For example, when studying the status of ideological and political work under market economy, some people think that since interest is the motivation of human beings, as long as economic development is completed, all the people’s needs can be met and ideological and political work can be canceled or replaced. In some ways, this has resulted in “one-handedness and one-handedness.” In studying how to mobilize people’s enthusiasm, often only pay attention to the means of material interests, and