近年来,随着城镇住宅商品化的发展,全国各地有关房屋维修基金的争议也明显增多。当房屋维修基金受到侵害,业主寻求司法救济时,经常会遇到诉讼主体不适、法律规定空缺等一系列的司法难题。近日,河南省南阳市中级人民法院终审判决为这类纠纷案提供了一个良好的范例。 In recent years, with the commercialization of urban residential development, controversy over the housing maintenance fund across the country has also increased significantly. When the housing maintenance fund is infringed upon and the owner seeks judicial remedies, he often encounters a series of judicial problems such as litigation discontent and vacancy prescribed by law. Recently, Nanyang Intermediate People’s Court of Henan Province, the final verdict for such disputes provides a good example.