从已出版的新编志书看,其中有关传主心理历程方面的记述尚不充分,已经记述了的,其史料依据又显得不足或有记述者“想为然”的痕迹。 我们必须清醒地意识到,修志绝不是写小说。小说中的心理活动可以虚构,只要符合“艺术真实”的规律就可以了,而志传是在写历史,记述传主的心理活动必须有充分的史实依据,必须记述确实发生过的历史过程,这种心理活动必须“无一事无出处”,必须建立在已有史料的基础之上,必须在史料的基础上去揣摩传主的心理,必须在真实史料的框架内有限度地做一些合理的,想象性 From the published books, there are still some inadequacies about the psychological course of the preacher. As we have already stated, the historical evidence is not sufficient or there is a trace of the writer’s “wanting to be”. We must be soberly aware that revisionism is by no means a novel. Psychological activities in the novel can be fictionalized as long as they conform to the law of “artistic reality”, and the chronicling is writing history. The description of the psychological activities of the deeds of the biography must be based on sufficient historical facts, the historical process that really happened must be recorded, This kind of psychological activity must be “without exception and without a source”. It must be based on the existing historical data. It is necessary to try to figure out the psychology of the protagonists on the basis of historical materials. We must, within the framework of the historical materials, Imaginative