专题背景批判不是个很平和的词,现在或者用得太多也有些滥。策划本期选题,我们倒不想回避其中的“批判”意味,因为从哪种角度说,“伪圣”和“犬儒”都不是什么令人舒服的字眼。但自信还有几分理性在握,所以我们的底气还是蛮足的。把“伪圣”和“犬儒”套到教育头上,是颇费思量的。不过聊以自慰的是,对今天的中国来说,这两个词并非源自教育,也不为教育所独享。这样说,并不是为教育辩护,而是对一种客观现实的袒露。 Thematic background criticism is not a very gentle word, and it is either too much or too heavy nowadays. In planning this issue, we do not want to dodge the “criticism” of the texts, because in any sense, “pseudo-san” and “cynicism” are not comfortable words. But there is still some confidence in confidence, so our emboldened still quite adequate. Putting “pseudo-san” and “cynicism” onto the head of education is quite deliberate. But to consolation is that for today’s China, these two terms are not derived from education, nor for education alone. To put it this way, it is not a defense of education but an explicit revelation of an objective reality.