论文部分内容阅读
學者們一般認為《毛傳》為毛亨所作,成書于漢朝建立之初,主要依據鄭玄、陸璣之說,但鄭玄之說不可據信,陸璣之說則是在鄭玄之說基礎上的增益。《後漢書·儒林傳》以為《毛傳》為毛萇所作,是糅合《漢書》與陸璣之挽。實際上,由注釋《漠書》諸家皆不注毛公名號看,题《毛傳》為毛亨作或毛萇作都不正確。《毛傳》應為毛公所作,成書于景帝前元二年至中元五年間。由《毛傳》的自相矛盾、有接續痕迹的傳文等,是可以看出《毛傳》是經過後人增益的。而《毛傳》有些傳文具有多層椎衍的性質,則說明其曾被多人增益。從《毛傳》引用《左傳》的情况看,毛公的弟子貫長卿已經封《毛傳》有所增益。而由六“笙詩”序與《小雅·都人士》首章傳文看,《毛傳》的定型則在哀帝建平元年至平帝元始五年間,徐敖對其作了最後的整理。
Scholars generally think that “Mao Chuan” was made by Mao Heng. When the book was first established in the Han Dynasty, it was mainly based on Zheng Xuan and Lu Ji, but Zheng Xuanzhi said that it was impossible to believe that Lu Jizhi said it was based on Zheng Xuanzhi’s theory. “Post Han Scholar Biography” that “Mao Biography” made for Mao Zan, is a blend of “Han” and Lu Ji’s turn. In fact, by the Notes “Mi Book” are not all note Mao Gong name, the title “Mao Biography” is Mao Hengyi or Mao Zuo made incorrect. “Mao Biography” should be made by Mao Gong, and finished in the second year of Emperor Jingdi from Yuan Zhongyuan to five years. From “Mao Biography” contradictory, there are traces of the passage, etc., we can see that “Mao Biography” is gain through the descendants. The “Mao Biography,” some of the text of the nature of multi-layered vertebral, then it has been more than gain. From “Mao Chuan” quoted “Zuo Zhuan” situation, Mao Gong’s disciple Guan Changqing has sealed “Mao Chuan” gain. By the six “Sheng poetry ” preface and “Xiaoya people are” the first chapter of the text to see, “Mao Chuan” stereotypes in the first year of Emperor Ai Jianping to Pingdiyuan first five years, Xu Ao made the final arrangement .