虚伪自认的效力因采取自由主义诉讼观还是社会的诉讼观有所不同。应修正古典辩论主义为协同主义,因为它在虚伪自认面前暴露出了僵化和空洞。根据协同主义和真实义务的要求,虚伪自认是对公法义务的违反,不应认为当事人有虚伪自认的权利和自由。 The effectiveness of hypocrisy is somewhat different because of the concept of liberal litigation or social litigation. The classical debate doctrine should be amended to be synergistic because it exposes its rigidity and emptiness in the face of hypocrisy. According to the requirements of synergy and true obligations, hypocrisy is a violation of the obligations of public law and should not be regarded as parties’ hypocrisy rights and freedoms.