论文部分内容阅读
由于多年来缺乏可供遵循的具体规则,实践中的鉴定问题比较混乱。其中,重新鉴定就是一个较为突出的问题。在很多情况下,当事人对鉴定结论不满意的,动辄要求重新鉴定,甚至无休无止,以致产生多头鉴定、鉴定结论相互矛盾的现象。这一方面使人民法院无法认定鉴定结论的证明力;另一方面使当事人不相信鉴定结论,即使对鉴定结论不提出异议,也希望重新鉴定一次,改变鉴定结论带来的不利后果。这一现象的产生,直接影响到法院审判工作中“公正与效率”主题的实现。为解决这一问题,最高法院作出的《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》(今年4月l日生效,下称《规
Due to the lack of specific rules that can be followed for many years, identification problems in practice are rather chaotic. Among them, re-appraisal is a more prominent issue. In many cases, the parties are dissatisfied with the conclusion of the appraisal, often require re-appraisal, or endless endless, resulting in long identification, appraisal conclusion contradictory phenomenon. On the one hand, the people’s court can not identify the proof power of the conclusion of the appraisal. On the other hand, the parties are not convinced of the appraisal conclusion. Even if the appraisal conclusion is not challenged, the court also wishes to re-appraise the appraisal result and change the unfavorable consequence of appraisal conclusion. The occurrence of this phenomenon has a direct impact on the realization of the theme of “fairness and efficiency” in the court trial. To solve this problem, the Supreme Court made “a number of Provisions on Civil Proceedings” (April 1 this year entered into force, hereinafter referred to as "rules