论文部分内容阅读
简要介绍了中国ＣＪＢ、美国ＬＲＦＤ、日本ＡＩＪ和欧洲ＥＣ４规范中有关方钢管混凝土基本构件的设计方法，并将以上方法的计算结果和收集到的大量试验结果进行了分析对比，其中包括１５８个轴压、１５个纯弯及１４７个压弯构件，结果表明各设计规范均能较好地估算构件的承载力，但ＬＲＦＤ、ＡＩＪ和ＥＣ４的计算结果整体上偏于安全，ＧＪＢ的计算结果则和试验结果较为一致，能较好反映构件的实际承载力。
This paper briefly introduces the design method of CFST basic components in CJB of China, LRFD of USA, Japan AIJ and EC4 of Europe, and compares the calculated results of the above method with the collected large quantities of test results, including 158 axes The results show that all the design codes can well estimate the bearing capacity of members, but the calculation results of LRFD, AIJ and EC4 are overall safer, and the calculation results of GJB and The test results are more consistent, can better reflect the actual carrying capacity of components.