论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨经尿道前列腺汽化电切术治疗前列腺增生症的临床疗效。方法 128例老年前列腺增生患者随机分成两组,观察组采用经尿道前列腺汽化电切术(TUVP),对照组采用经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP),比较临床指标和疗效。结果观察组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后留置导尿管时间和住院时间明显少于对照组,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),并发症发生率低。结论经尿道前列腺汽化电切术适应证宽、创伤小、术后恢复快、住院时间短,并发症的发生率低,值得推广。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of transurethral vaporization of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods A total of 128 elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were randomly divided into two groups. The observation group was treated with transurethral vaporization of the prostate (TUVP), while the control group was treated with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Clinical indexes and therapeutic effects were compared. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative indwelling catheterization time and hospitalization time in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05), and the complication rate was low. Conclusions Transurethral electrovaporization of the transurethral resection of the indications is wide, less trauma, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay, the incidence of complications is low, it is worth promoting.