杨义从东亚学的角度阐发了战争的历史记忆,认为我们今天所要讨论的历史记忆,就是从文学与战争的关系中,正视和剖析那场沉重的东亚地图的撕裂和反撕裂的战争,及其至今尚未得到平复的严重的后遗症,从中寻求人类的正义感、责任感民族以及民族和国家之间正常、健康、和好、互惠发展的历史可能性。严家炎探讨了抗战时期启蒙与救亡的关系,认为在抗日战争这个“救亡”的高潮时期,文学中的“启蒙”仍与“抗日”结伴而行,并没有停止。“启蒙”任务后来被取消,真正的原因在革命队伍内部,是封建思想侵袭革命队伍的结果。王富仁一方面分析了战争记忆与战争文学之间的区别,认为战争文学应当是作家从战争记忆中做出的一种人性的反思;另一方面分析了中外战争文学的差异,认为理想的战争文学应当充盈可贵的人类意识和人性意识。黄修己对战争文学做了深刻的反思,认为我们在政治层面上歌颂正义战争的同时,还应该从人性层面上批判战争。战争文学最主要的不是战争中的宣传鼓动作用,而是通过影响人的感情来提升人性。吴福辉提出了“大抗战文学”的概念,并深入分析了五种类型的“战争体验”小说,认为这些作品将战时特殊的体验延伸到对民族性的自省,凝结为战争文学的最好的结晶。刘增杰深入论述了抗战反思文学思潮,认为在这种反思文学中,一类偏重于对现实政治层面弊端进行揭露与鞭挞;另一类则站在人类的立场,从精神层面对民族惰性进行剖析。指出:反思文学是抗战文学结出的最成熟的果实,抗战反思文学中保留着永具活力民族记忆。秦弓将眼光投向了已经淡出人们历史记忆的反映抗日战争正面战场的文学创作和文学研究,认为表现正面战场的文学创作取得了丰硕的成果,留下了关于抗战的珍贵的民族记忆。应该珍惜这笔宝贵的文学财富,全面启动抗战文学与正面战场的研究,借以填补现代文学史不应有的空白。 Yang Yi elaborates the historical memory of war from the perspective of East Asian studies and holds that the historical memory we are discussing today is to face and analyze the torn and anti-tearing war in that heavy East Asia map from the relationship between literature and war , And its still untoward serious sequelae, seeking the historic possibility of a sense of human justice, a responsible nation, and a normal, healthy, harmonious and mutually beneficial development among nations and nations. Yan Jiayan explored the relationship between enlightenment and national salvation during the War of Resistance Against Japan and held that in the height of the “Salvation” of the War of Resistance Against Japan, “Enlightenment” in literature still goes hand in hand with “Anti-Japanese War” and has not stopped. The mission of “Enlightenment” was later canceled. The real reason was that within the revolutionary ranks, the result of the feudal ideology’s invasion of the revolutionary ranks. On the one hand, Wang Furen analyzed the difference between war memory and war literature, that war literature should be a reflection of human nature made by writers from war memory, on the other hand, it analyzed the difference between Chinese and foreign war literature, and considered the ideal war literature Should be filled with valuable human and human consciousness. Huang Xiuji made a profound reflection on the literature of war and believed that while praising the just war at the political level, we should also criticize the war at the human level. The most important thing in the literature of war is not the propaganda and agitation in the war but the promotion of human nature by influencing people’s feelings. Wu Fuhui put forward the concept of “Great Anti-Japanese War Literature” and deeply analyzed five types of “War Experience” novels, believing that these works extend the wartime special experience to the introspection of nationality and condense into war literature The best crystallization. In his reflections on literature, Liu Zengjie discussed in depth the ideological trend of the introspective literature of the War of Resistance Against Japan and held that in the reflexive literature, one kind of emphasis is on exposing and disrupting the malpractices in the political realities; the other is standing on the position of mankind and analyzing the national inertia from the spiritual perspective. It points out that introspective literature is the most mature fruit of anti-war literature, and retains the vibrant national memory in anti-war reflexive literature. Qin Gong turned his gaze to literary creation and literary studies that reflected the historical battlefield of the Anti-Japanese War that has faded out of people’s historical memories. He believes that the literary creation of the frontal battlefield has achieved fruitful results, leaving behind the precious national memory of the war of resistance. We should cherish this precious literary wealth, start the study of anti-war literature and frontal battlefields in an all-round way, so as to fill in the blank that should not exist in the history of modern literature.