在司法的过程中,法律推理发生着必不可少的作用。一般意义上的法律推理表现在法官司法活动的整个过程中,这个推理过程表达为:以选择的法律规则为大前提,以查明的案件事实为小前提,然后按照一定的逻辑方法推出案件的处理结论。但是在特殊意义上,法律推理也表现在法官解释法律和确认事实的过程中。从前者来说:很多情况下,作为司法推理的大前提之规则并不是意义明确而清晰的,即使有 In the judicial process, legal reasoning takes an essential role. In the general sense, the legal reasoning manifests itself in the entire process of the judicial activities of the judge. This reasoning process is expressed as follows: taking the choice of legal rules as the premise, ascertaining the facts of the case as the small premise, and then introducing the case in accordance with certain logical methods Handle the conclusion. But in a special sense, legal reasoning is also reflected in the process of judges interpreting the law and confirming the facts. In the former case: In many cases, the rules that are the prerequisites of judicial reasoning are not clear and explicit,