论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】图书质量认定包括内容、编校等四个方面,但图书内容争议,除涉及法律禁止性规定内容外,原则上不属于民事诉讼受理范围。辞书类图书内容和编校存在重合之处,区分案件争议事实属于内容抑或编校范畴,需准确理解编校的确切含义。本案争议事实部分实属关于辞书内容的争议,而非出版行业通常意义的编校范围,当不属人民法院民事诉讼受理范围。
The purpose of the referee The quality of the book includes content, editing and other four aspects, but the content of the book controversial, in addition to the provisions of the law prohibiting the content, in principle, does not belong to the scope of the acceptance of civil proceedings. The contents of books and dictionaries of the dictionary overlap, the distinction between the controversial fact that belongs to the controversial content or editing areas, need to accurately understand the exact meaning of editing. Part of the controversial fact of this case is the controversy over the contents of the dictionaries, rather than the usual meaning of the publishing industry editing range, not when people’s court civil proceedings.