最近,某县的一个调查提醒我们:小学语文教学中的“满堂灌”已不多见,代之而起的是“满堂问”。满堂问貌似气氛热烈,实际上,那些碎散、多余、无意义的提问作为无用信息分散了教学注意力,浪费了学生的宝贵时光,严重干扰了师生双边的交流,阻碍着课堂教学质量的提高。别以为课堂提问只是整个教学过程中的“细微末节”,科学的提问对于理解课文,启发思维及思维方法的训练都有着重要作用。正因为如此,本刊在一段时间里将配合教学进度发表课堂教学设问的研究文章,欢迎广大教师能结合课堂教学与具体课文来议一议这个问题,仗我们的课堂设问更科学、更灵活、更符合学生学习的心理,从而引燃学生思维的火花。 Recently, a survey in one county reminded us that “full house irrigation” in primary school Chinese language teaching is rare, and instead it is “full house asking.” In fact, those fragmented, redundant and meaningless questions distract the attention of students as valuable information, wasting valuable time for students, seriously interfering in the bilateral exchanges between teachers and students and hindering the quality of classroom teaching improve. Do not think that the classroom questioning is only the “meager” in the whole teaching process. Scientific questions play an important role in understanding the text, enlightening the thinking and training of the thinking method. Because of this, the journal will, for a period of time, publish research articles on classroom teaching and learning. We welcome teachers to discuss this issue with classroom teaching and specific texts. Flexible, more in line with the psychological learning of students, thereby igniting the spark of student thinking.