文章针对图书馆学实证研究本身存在的局限性,分析了过度推崇实证研究将导致的三个方面的弊端:事实判断与价值判断的分离;以形式合理性代替实质合理性;以科学思维排斥人文思维。作者认为图书馆学研究中的实证方法与非实证方法之间不存在孰优孰劣的问题,应从方法一元论走向方法多元论,从方法专制走向方法民主。 According to the limitation of the empirical study of library science itself, this paper analyzes the drawbacks of three aspects that lead to the excessively respected empirical research: the separation of fact judgment and value judgments; the replacement of substantive rationality by form rationality; the rejection of humanity by scientific thinking thinking. The author thinks that there is no problem of the one between the positive method and the non-positive method in the study of library science. From the method monism to the method pluralism, it should go from method autocracy to method democracy.