论文部分内容阅读
自20世纪初梁启超鼓吹新史学以来,学界对新史学的理解几经流变。然而,史学的“社会科学化”及“民史”研究的倾向始终是新史学两大最基本的主张:在内容上要求突破以帝王将相为中心的政治史藩篱,而以民众史、社会史为主体;在方法上要求突破传统史学的束缚,充分吸收自然科学、社会科学的成果和方法辅助史学研究。但是,这些主张大都停留在理论层面,缺乏具体的史学实践。中山大学语言历史学研究所成立后,在研究内容上从民俗材料的收集、整理和研究入手,成为“民史”建设躬身践行的先锋,在方法上运用现代语言学、人类学、民族学、天文学等多学科交叉的方法研究历史,在中国近代学术史上具有重要影响。
Since Liang Qichao advocated new historiography at the beginning of the 20th century, the understanding of the new historiography in the academic circles has been changing. However, the historical tendency of “social science” and “civil history” has always been the two most basic propositions of Neo-historiography: the content requires the breakthrough of political history centered on emperors’ People’s history and social history as the main body. In terms of methods, it is required to break through the shackles of traditional history and fully absorb the achievements and methods of natural science and social science to assist historical research. However, most of these ideas stay in the theoretical level, the lack of specific historical practice. After the founding of the Institute of Linguistic History, Sun Yat-sen University started its research on the collection, compilation and study of folk materials and became the vanguard of “Civil History” and practiced in the practice of modern linguistics and anthropology , Ethnology, astronomy and other multidisciplinary methods of study history, has an important influence on the academic history of modern China.