论文部分内容阅读
五十年代以来,我国史学界,普遍因袭着三十至四十年代的一种观点,认为:在帝国主义和无产阶级革命时代,殖民地半殖民地国家的资产阶级,不管是民族资产阶级还是小资产阶级,都不可能领导本国的民族民主运动达到胜利。但是,第二次世界大战后,殖民地半殖民地国家的国际环境和国内状况发生了重大变化,如印度独立后,国大党政府对印度的土地制度和农业进行了重大改革,取得比较明显的成就。因此,继续探讨这一问题,不仅能够发扬正视历史的求实学风,而且具有辩证地理解马克思主义理论的现实意义。
Since the 1950s, historians and scholars in our country have generally followed the view of the 1930s and the 40s that: In the era of imperialism and the proletarian revolution, the bourgeoisie in the colonial and semi-colonial countries, whether the national bourgeoisie or the small assets No class can lead its own national-democratic movement to victory. However, after the Second World War, major changes have taken place in the international environment and the domestic situation in the colonial and semi-colonial countries. For instance, after India’s independence, the Grand National Party Government made major reforms in India’s land system and agriculture and achieved relatively obvious achievements . Therefore, continuing to probe into this issue can not only carry forward the realistic and realistic style of studying the history, but also have the practical significance of dialectically understanding the Marxist theory.