论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察对比微创与常规治疗脑出血的临床疗效。方法:选取2011年1月~2013年3月于我院治疗的100例脑出血患者为研究对象,随机分为微创组和对照组各50例;对照组给予常规治疗,微创组在常规治疗基础上给予微创颅内血肿清除治疗,观察比较2组患者的治疗效果。结果:经研究比较发现,微创组总有效率及良好率明显优于对照组,P<0.05,二者差异显著;微创组的死亡率低于对照组,P<0.05具有显著差异。结论:微创治疗脑出血较常规治疗效果好,能明显提高有效率,降低死亡率,提高病人的生活质量。
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive and routine treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods: A total of 100 patients with cerebral hemorrhage treated in our hospital from January 2011 to March 2013 were selected and randomly divided into minimally invasive group (n = 50) and control group (n = 50). The control group was given routine treatment. The minimally invasive group Based on the treatment of minimally invasive intracranial hematoma removal treatment was observed and compared the treatment effect of two groups of patients. Results: The study found that total effective rate and good rate of minimally invasive group was significantly better than the control group, P <0.05, significant difference between the two; minimally invasive group mortality was lower than the control group, P <0.05 significant difference. Conclusion: The minimally invasive treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage is more effective than conventional treatment, which can significantly improve the efficiency, reduce mortality and improve the quality of life of patients.