论文部分内容阅读
目的对子宫内膜息肉不孕患者治疗中行宫腔镜下电切术与刮宫术治疗的临床疗效进行对比分析。方法选取子宫内膜息肉不孕患者66例,随机分为两组,对照组32例接受宫腔镜下刮宫术,观察组34例接受宫腔镜下电切术,对比两组患者术后月经量、并发症发生情况、妊娠率与复发率。结果两组患者治疗后月经量均有显著减少,且观察组月经量显著低于对照组(P<0.05),妊娠率显著高于对照组,复发率显著低于对照组(P<0.05),两组患者治疗后均无大出血、穿孔、感染、周围脏器损伤及宫腔粘连等严重并发症发生。结论在对子宫内膜息肉不孕患者展开治疗时,宫腔镜下电切术具有显著临床疗效,可对患者预后质量予以显著改善,值得在临床中推广。
Objective To compare the clinical curative effect of hysteroscopic resection and curettage in endometrial polyps infertility patients. Methods 66 patients with endometrial polyps infertility were randomly divided into two groups, control group, 32 patients underwent hysteroscopic curettage, observation group, 34 patients underwent hysteroscopic resection, compared two groups of patients after menstruation The amount of complications, the incidence of pregnancy and recurrence rate. Results After treatment, the menstrual volume of both groups were significantly decreased, and the menstrual flow in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P <0.05). The pregnancy rate was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the recurrence rate was significantly lower than that of the control group (P <0.05) No severe bleeding, perforation, infection, peripheral organ damage and intrauterine adhesions occurred in both groups after treatment. Conclusion In the treatment of endometrial polyps infertility patients, hysteroscopic resection has a significant clinical effect, the quality of prognosis of patients can be significantly improved, it is worth to promote in the clinic.