论文部分内容阅读
理性是古希腊文明的创造,它与规范紧密相连,法律则是理性的集中体现。法律规范的层次性特点是建构法律论证体系的基础,这种层次性表现为一条法律之链。现代规范理论从科学取向转向实在的生活世界,具有商谈论辩的取向,黑尔的道德论证理论和图尔敏一般论证模式正是这种商谈论辩取向的典型。规范的商谈论辩取向的进一步延伸,是产生众多的关于法律论证的新设想,这些有关法律论证的设想既是法学理论工作者面向司法实践的产物,也是法律实务工作者寻求理论支持的产物。
Rationality is the creation of ancient Greek civilization, it is closely linked with the norms, the law is the concentrated expression of reason. The hierarchical nature of legal norms is the basis for the construction of legal argumentation system, this level of performance as a chain of law. The modern normative theory has shifted from scientific orientation to real life world, with the orientation of discussing and arguing, Hale’s moral argumentation theory and Tulmé’s general argumentation model are the typical examples of such discussions. The further extension of the normative negotiation and argumentation orientation is the result of numerous new ideas about legal argumentation. The assumption of these legal argumentation is not only the product of legal theoretical workers facing the judicial practice, but also the product of the legal practitioners seeking theoretical support.