论文部分内容阅读
本着实事求是,文章不写一句空的学术追求,自我反思宋史研究中存在的一些问题,诸如缺少全局观和主观片面性的主要表现:各走极端;只知其一;过甚其词;数据离谱,其结果只能是南辕北辙,适得其反,缺少说服力。良好的评论机制是学术进步的动力。之所以剖析宋史研究中的主观片面性及其背后绝对对立的思维定势和先入为主的惰性心理,意在推动学术评论中的自我质疑、集体反思之风,以期改变表扬与自我表扬相结合的积习。
In the light of seeking truth from facts, the article does not write an empty academic pursuit, self-reflection of some problems in the study of the Song Dynasty, such as the lack of global and subjective one-sidedness of the main manifestations: each go to extremes; only one of them; too wordy; data outrageous , The result can only be diametrically opposed, counterproductive, lack of persuasion. Good comment mechanism is the motivation for academic progress. The reason why we should analyze the subjective one-sidedness in the study of the Song Dynasty and its absolute opposite thinking and the preconceived inertia are intended to promote the self-doubt in the academic commentary and the style of collective reflection so as to change the combination of praising and self-praising .