论文部分内容阅读
当下策展的“泛化”引起了学界对于策展的价值重估与理论清理。围绕策展的论争主要聚焦于什么样的人可以称之为策展人,策展的功能何在?[1]是否找到一笔经费邀几个人拿几件作品放到展厅里挂起来、写点文字、出本画册、搞个开幕式、找几家媒体一报道,就可以称之为策展人?而参加展览的人无论其作品的价值优劣均可以因此顺利获得艺术家的称号?这些尖锐的问题将艺术界的视线重新拉回到“严肃”的学术界面。到目前为止还不敢断定这种
The curatorial “generalization” of the current curse caused the academic circles to revalue and clean up the theory of curatorial value. The controversy surrounding the curatorial debate focused on what kind of person can be called a curator, what is the function of curator? [1] Whether to find a sum of money to invite a few people to take a few pieces of work in the exhibition hall to hang up, write Text, a picture book, a opening ceremony, to find a few media coverage, it can be called a curator? Who participate in the exhibition regardless of the merits of their works can therefore be successfully obtained the title of the artist? These sharp The question pulls the art world back to the “serious” academic interface. So far not sure of this