司法公开作为人民法院司法为民的重要举措,通过向公众和当事人公开立案、开庭、庭审、减刑假释等信息节点,实现审判过程信息公开;通过公开裁判文书和执行信息等核心内容,实现裁判结果公开。制度设计目的旨在实现司法活动过程透明、结果透明,但从实践效果来看,司法公开的信息并未完全与复杂的司法现实产生有效应对,未能完全满足社会公众的信息需求,司法公开的社会看法与法院自我评价之间存在部分反差。 Judicial disclosure as an important measure for people’s court of justice for the people, through the public and the parties to open information, trial, trial, parole and other information nodes to achieve the process of the trial information disclosure; through the core content of the public judiciary instruments and implementation of information to achieve the referee results public. The purpose of system design is to make the process of judicial activities transparent and the results transparent. However, judging from the practical effect, the information of judicial openness does not produce an effective response to complex judicial reality completely, and can not fully meet the information needs of the public. There is a partial contrast between social opinions and court self-evaluation.