书稿中难免存在或多或少的错误和不足。哪些可以“过而存之”,哪些非要订正不可,这是很考编辑“手艺”的。当然,可供编辑判断取舍的尺度还是那四个字:多就少改。问题在于,该“就”而未“就”是不对的,该“改”而未“改”则更不对。窃以为,“勇于批判”与“多就少改”,应当并行不悖。 There are inevitably more or less errors and deficiencies in the manuscript. Which can be “saved”, which must be revised, which is a very test editor “craft”. Of course, for the editor to judge the scale or the four words: more to change less. The problem is that the “right” and “not” “right” is wrong, the “change” without “change” is even more wrong. Theft believes that “daring to criticize” and “more to change less” should go hand in hand.