论文部分内容阅读
福建省德化县人民检察院许春燕认为:《民事诉讼法》第185条规定:上级人民检察院对下级人民法院已经发生法律效力的判决、裁定,发现原判决、裁定认定事实的主要证据不足的,应当按照审判监督程序提出抗诉。实践中有一种观点认为,必须是原裁判认定事实的主要证据不足,影响当事人实体利益才进行监督,对事实认定有错误但对当事人实体权利义务
Xu Chunyan, Dehua People’s Procuratorate of Fujian Province, held that Article 185 of the Code of Civil Procedure stipulates that if the superior people’s procuratorate decides or ruled that the lower people’s court has legally effectual and finds that the original evidence and the ruling are not enough evidences, The protest should be filed in accordance with the judicial supervision procedure. In practice, there is a view that must be the main evidence of the original referee to determine the lack of evidence, the interests of the parties affected the entity before the supervision of the facts found that there is a mistake but the rights and obligations of the parties entity