论文部分内容阅读
目的探究不同采血方法在血常规检验中的具体应用,比较其效果。方法以我院2015年9月至2016年9月收治的112例进行血常规的检验的患者作为本次的研究对象,并将其分为观察组和对照组,每组56例。对照组采用末梢采血的方式,观察组采用静脉采血的方式。采血过程结束后对两组患者血液标本的血常规八项结果进行数据对比分析,判断具体效果。结果本次研究结果显示,观察组的血常规检查结果除WBC一项要低于对照组以外,其余指标都要高于对照组,说明检测结果上观察组要更加精确。两组数据对比差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相比于末梢采血的方式,静脉采血具有更加显著的效果,结果稳定,数值准确,因此可以在今后的临床工作中被推广使用。
Objective To explore the application of different blood sampling methods in routine blood tests and compare their effects. Methods One hundred and twelve patients who underwent routine blood tests from September 2015 to September 2016 in our hospital were selected as the study subjects and divided into observation group and control group with 56 cases in each group. In the control group, peripheral blood sampling was adopted. In the observation group, venous blood sampling was used. Blood sampling after the end of the two groups of blood samples of blood routine eight results of comparative analysis of data to determine the specific effect. Results The results of this study showed that the blood test results of the observation group were higher than those of the control group except that one of the WBCs was lower than the control group, indicating that the observation group should be more accurate on the test results. There was significant difference between the two groups of data, with statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with peripheral blood sampling, venous blood sampling has a more significant effect, the results are stable and accurate, and therefore can be used in clinical practice in the future.