翻译标准问题是个有争议性的论题。国内翻译界围绕翻译标准的认识可谓见仁见智,但“忠实”原则却几乎得到了一致认同;西方功能派翻译目的论的引进与推广,在很大程度上活跃了国内的学术氛围,为国内翻译理论研究开辟了新视角。许多人开始别出心裁地以目的论为指导,片面强调翻译的“目的”原则,视“忠实”原则等传统译论为“鸡肋”,意图弃之而后快。这种急功近利的短视行为实在是十分不可取的。其实,两者之间不必相互排斥,而是存在融通的基础,谋求两者的和谐统一才是正确的努力方向。 Translation standards is a controversial topic. The understanding of translation standards in the domestic translation community can be described as a matter of opinion, but the principle of “loyalty” is almost unanimously approved. The introduction and promotion of the translational teleology in the West has largely revitalized the academic atmosphere in China and provided a platform for domestic translation theories Research opens up new perspectives. Many people began to purposely use the Skopos theory as a guide, unilaterally emphasize the principle of “purpose” of translation and consider the “faithfulness” as the traditional method of translation, which is intended to be discarded and then discarded. This short-sighted quick success is very undesirable. In fact, there is no need for mutual exclusion between the two, but rather as a basis for integration. It is only the correct direction of efforts to seek a harmonious unity between the two.