论文部分内容阅读
《新观察》杂志1989年第5期,发表了署名戴煌的题为《在层层厚网的覆盖下》(以下简称《网》文)的报告文学,以及署名仲兵《在法律面前为何不能平等》的评论文章,对发生在四川省凉山彝族自治州季小勇等流氓、故意伤害案件及其有关审判情况,进行了披露和评论。一时,公众瞩目,舆论纷纷。 《网》文说:“愤愤不平的人们不禁纷纷提问:对这案子的一度大快人心、震撼人心的判决,是怎么被鼓捣成这等灰溜溜的模样的?在那一层层严密厚实的关系网的覆盖下,到底做了多少肮脏交易?那些号称‘人民公仆’的人们,敢不敢向人民‘公开’一下?”对此,季小勇案的一审法院——四川省凉山彝族自治州中级人民法院院长罗伍达说:我们是公开审判季小勇案的,法院对此案的审理是完全可以公开的。 他认为:
New Observations Magazine No. 5, 1989, published a report entitled Dai Huang’s report entitled “Under the cover of layers of thick mesh” (hereinafter referred to as “net”) of the reportage, as well as the signature Zhongbing “why before the law Can not be equal, ”the commentary articles on the occurrence in Sichuan Province Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture Ji Xiaoyong and other rogue, deliberately hurt the case and its related trial, conducted a disclosure and commentary. For a time, the public attention, public opinion one after another. The “net” article said: “Angered people can not help but have asked: the case of the once-so-happy, stirring sentence, how to be tampered with such a dingy look like that in the layers of thick and thick network How many dirty transactions have been done in the past? Who dares to publicize the people who claim to be ’public servants’? ”In this regard, the court of first instance in Ji Xiaoyong - Intermediate People’s Court of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture in Sichuan Province Dean Luo Wuda said: We are publicly trial of Ji Xiaoyong case, the court’s hearing of the case is entirely open. he thinks: