论文部分内容阅读
学界对于高空抛物侵权行为的责任认定早就存在争议。本文通过对高空抛物侵权行为的系统说明,对理论和实务中几种主要观点进行评判,得出高空抛物侵权行为不同于共同危险行为,不适用公平责任原则和过错推定原则,而只是一般的侵权行为,适用一般侵权的规定。对于找不到真正施害行为人而使受害人的权利得不到救济的情形,应由社会保险和商业保险来承担的结论。
Academics have long been in dispute about the responsibility of parabolic high-altitude infringement. This article through the system description of the paragliding act at high altitude, the theory and practice of several major points of view, concluded that paramount abuse at high altitude is different from the common dangerous behavior, does not apply the principle of fair responsibility and fault inferring, but only general infringement Conduct, applicable to the general provisions of infringement. The conclusion that social security and commercial insurance should bear the conclusion that the victim’s rights can not be remedied when the real victimizer can not be found can be found.