论文部分内容阅读
美国、德国和韩国等关于搜索引擎服务商行为规制的法律体制较为完善,而我国尚未明确搜索引擎服务商的责任认定与归责原则。《搜索引擎服务商抵制违法和不良信息自律规范》未明确规定搜索引擎服务商违反相应义务及直接侵权的归责原则,该规范有关缺乏可行性的公众举报制度的规定应该予以删除;间接增加服务商追责难度的法律术语也应进行更严谨的表述;通过设置24小时监控网站的机构并建立专门的举报受理机构。搜索引擎服务提供商的注意义务、过错判断标准和连带责任等法律技术问题的完善,将会起到促进搜索引擎服务商防止违法和不良信息传播的作用。
The United States, Germany and South Korea on the search engine service provider behavior regulation of the legal system more perfect, but our country has not yet clear search engine service provider’s responsibility to identify and attribution principle. “Search engine service providers against illegal and unhealthy information self-regulation norms” does not specify the liability of search engine service providers in violation of the corresponding obligations and direct infringement, the norms of the lack of feasibility of the public reporting system should be deleted; indirectly increase service The legal terminology of chastisement should also be more rigorously stated; by setting up a 24-hour web site monitoring agency and setting up a special reporting agency. The improvement of legal and technical issues such as the duty of care, fault judgment standards and joint and several liability of search engine service providers will play a role in promoting search engine service providers in preventing illegal and unhealthy information dissemination.