论文部分内容阅读
近期欣读《中学历史教学》和《中学历史教学参考》中有关“教材分析”或“商榷与正误”栏目文章后,笔者感受颇深。教材是中学历史课堂教学的载体,也是高考历史命题的依据。其知识性、资料性、科学性和严密性是不言而喻的。在这里,笔者对其“六七百处错误”的结论不敢苟同,但现行初高中教材确实存在着对重大历史事件的表述不够统一的情况。兹就杂志中尚未有刊出的事例列举如下,供编者在修订教材过程中参考。
Recently, after reading “The History Teaching in Middle Schools” and “References on Teaching Material and Analysis of Business Texts” in the “References on Teaching History in Middle Schools”, the author experienced quite a bit. The teaching materials are the carrier of history classroom teaching in middle school and the basis of the historical proposition of college entrance examination. Its knowledge, information, science and rigor are self-evident. Here, the author does not agree with the conclusion of “six or seven hundred errors,” but there are indeed cases in which the current high school textbooks do not have uniform representations of major historical events. The following is a list of examples not yet published in the magazine for reference by the editors in the revision of the textbooks.