刚才听了诸位的高见,我有一个非常深刻的体会就是,一件简单的事情经过学者们的研究就复杂化了。我觉得,可以说所有人都知道什么是错案,但是经过刚才诸位一说,对于错案又不好定义了。每个人所讲的都有道理,但是也都存在一些问题。仲一教授的观点可以概括成凡是生效判决在再审时被改判的就是错案。丁杰教授运用了一个相反的方法来界定错案的标准,他认为 I have just listened to you, I have a very profound experience is that a simple thing after the study of scholars is complicated. In my opinion, it can be said that everyone knows what is wrong, but after just one statement, it is not well defined for the wrong case. Everyone makes sense, but there are also some problems. Professor Zhong Yi’s point of view can be summarized as a valid case where the effective judgment is restructured at the trial. Professor Ding Jie used an opposite approach to define the standard of misstatement, he believes