司法独立是清末预备立宪期间官员们改制的中心议题之一。在他们提倡司法独立的言论中存在三种话语态度或认知倾向,即“制度崇拜”的“司法独立”、宪政神话下的“司法专官论”和“大权政治”下的一项措施。然而,这三种司法独立的言论因缺乏人民主权观,从而总是囿于“政府治权”下的“职权分工”问题,未曾迈进“国家主权”下的“权力分立”领域。 Judicial independence is one of the central issues in the restructuring of officials during the period of constitutional constitutionalism in the late Qing Dynasty. There are three discourse attitudes or cognitive tendencies in their advocacy of judicial independence: “judicial independence” of “institutional worship”, “judicial expertise” under the constitutional myth, and “power politics ”Under a measure. However, these three kinds of judicially independent remarks have always led to the issue of “separation of powers and responsibilities” under the “government authority” because of the lack of people’s sovereignty, and have not advanced to the “power” under “state sovereignty.” Discrete "area.