论文部分内容阅读
一般哲学史教材,都有芝诺否定运动的论证的批判,可惜大都没有从科学思想发展角度对其错误加以考察,而只是重复了经典作家对其错误的哲学论述,这些论述显然是正确的,但由于对这早已属于物理学范围内可以解决的认识问题缺乏明晰的分析,给那些反对辨证法的人留下了诘难的地盘,并同时对不懂科学的人易造成对辩证法的误解。因此,对芝诺的关于否定运动的四个命题进行科学(即物理学)认识论原因的探讨,实有其必要。
The textbook of general philosophy history has a critique of Zeno’s negative argument. Unfortunately, most of them did not examine their mistakes from the perspective of the development of scientific thought, but merely repeated the philosophical exposition of classic writer’s mistakes. These statements are obviously correct. However, because of the lack of a clear analysis of the cognitive problems that can already be solved within the scope of physics, those who oppose the dialectical method left a difficult site, and at the same time, people who do not understand science can easily cause misunderstandings about dialectics. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss the scientific (ie, physics) epistemological reasons of Zeno’s four propositions of negative movement.