论文部分内容阅读
现有的科技档案管理学教材和论著中,一般都没有阐明科技档案如何处理全宗的问题,以致造成一种假象,似乎全宗理论不适用于科技档案管理.究其原因,主要是因为科技档案只是档案大家族中的一员,研究科技档案的管理实际上只是研究一部分档案的管理.研究工作者的着眼点或者说是研究领域,只是部分档案而不是全部档案,那就难怪不研究全宗问题.但是,这不等于说全宗理论不适用于科技档案,而且在全面阐述科技档案管理问题的教材、专著中,交代一下科技档案的全宗归属问题是必要的.我主编的《科技档案管理学》中就存在着这一疏漏,现在试图弥补.全宗定义,简言之就是一个立档单位的全部档案.科技档案既然是立档单位全部档案中的一部分,那么科技档案也必然是该单位全宗中的一个组成部分.这是不应当有异议的.比如,有些专门性档案馆,他们接收档案的范围是一个单位的全部永久保存的档案,包
In the existing textbooks and treatises of science and technology archives management, there is generally no elucidation on how science and technology archives deal with the issue of Fonds, resulting in an illusion that it seems that the theory of general religion does not apply to science and technology archives management.The reason is mainly because technology Archives is only one member of the archives family, the management of scientific and technological archives is actually only part of the management of archives research. The focus of the study workers or research areas, only part of the file instead of all the files, then it is no wonder not to study However, this does not mean that the theory of Fontant does not apply to scientific and technological archives, but also in a comprehensive exposition of teaching materials and monographs on scientific and technological archives management issues, it is necessary to explain the issue of Fonds belonging to the Fonds File management "in the existence of this omission, and now trying to make up the definition of Fonds, in short, is a filing unit of the entire file.Science and technology files since it is part of the file archiving unit, then the file must also be scientific and technological It is an integral part of the unit’s fonds. There should be no objection to this. For example, some specialized archives who receive files Range is all the permanent preservation of archives a unit of package