论文部分内容阅读
目的探析慢性乙型肝炎患者应用护理干预对生活质量及心理健康的影响。方法 74例慢性乙型肝炎患者为观察对象,根据硬币法分为对照组与干预组,各37例。对照组患者采用常规护理,干预组患者在对照组基础上采用护理干预,对比分析两组患者生活质量及心理健康状态。结果干预组患者物质生活评分为(86.4±8.8)分,躯体功能评分为(78.8±8.0)分,心理功能评分为(86.6±8.3)分,社会功能评分为(84.5±8.5)分,均分别高于对照组患者的(67.9±8.7)、(61.7±8.2)、(60.7±8.6)、(64.9±8.7)分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预组患者焦虑评分为(39.8±3.7)分,抑郁评分为(37.1±3.4)分,均低于对照组患者的(48.7±3.9)、(46.5±3.3)分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对慢性乙型肝炎患者施行护理干预的临床效果更好,能够有效提高患者生活质量,改善患者心理健康状态,是一种值得临床应用与推广的护理方式。
Objective To explore the impact of nursing intervention on quality of life and mental health in patients with chronic hepatitis B Methods 74 cases of chronic hepatitis B patients were observed, divided into control group and intervention group according to the coin method, each 37 cases. Patients in the control group were treated with routine nursing. Patients in the intervention group were given nursing intervention on the basis of the control group, and the quality of life and mental health status were compared between the two groups. Results The score of physical life in the intervention group was (86.4 ± 8.8), body function score was (78.8 ± 8.0), mental function score was (86.6 ± 8.3), social function score was (84.5 ± 8.5) (67.9 ± 8.7), (61.7 ± 8.2), (60.7 ± 8.6) and (64.9 ± 8.7) points respectively in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The intervention group had an anxiety score of (39.8 ± 3.7) and a depression score of (37.1 ± 3.4) points, which were significantly lower than those in the control group (48.7 ± 3.9) and (46.5 ± 3.3), respectively <0.05). Conclusion The clinical effect of nursing intervention on patients with chronic hepatitis B is better, which can effectively improve the quality of life of patients and improve the mental health status of patients. It is a nursing method worthy of clinical application and promotion.