论文部分内容阅读
如果司法的位置和职能在20世纪90年代经历了显著的变化,真正富有意义的改革的缺失则限制了司法机构的革新。作者在此阐述了阻止法国全面承认法官的合法性和真正的司法权的阻力究竟在哪里。在所有需要的改革中,应该说司法程序改革是最为必要的,同时抛弃职权主义诉讼制度。最近发生的乌特尔案正暴露了这种制度的弊端。在机构制度方面,应保障最高司法委员会完全的自治,允许宪法委员会对法律的合宪性进行事后审查,扩大其提请审查范围。最后,司法制度应该优先考虑道义救济手段,以改善法官的行为,肯定法官价值;同时,应对制度下的所有层级提出强制性要求,把追求更好的司法作为己任,唯有如此才可以增加公众对于司法权方面的信心。
If the position and functions of the judiciary underwent significant changes in the 1990s, the absence of truly meaningful reforms limited the reform of the judiciary. Here, the author sets out the real resistance to France’s full recognition of the legitimacy of judges and the real judicial power. In all the reforms needed, it should be said that the reform of the judicial process is the most necessary and at the same time abandoning the system of procedural lawsuits. The recent Uter case is revealing the drawbacks of this system. In terms of institutional system, the Supreme Council of the Judiciary should be guaranteed complete autonomy, allowing the Constitutional Council to review the constitutionality of the law ex post facto and to expand the scope for its review. Finally, the judicial system should give priority to the means of moral relief in order to improve the performance of judges and affirm the value of judges. At the same time, it is necessary to impose mandatory requirements at all levels under the system and to pursue better justice as the only way to increase public participation Confidence in the administration of justice.