论文部分内容阅读
在我国民事诉讼法学中有关对如何分配证明责任问题的研究论著可谓文如沿海,《证据规定》公布实施以来学术界对《证据规定》的研究成果也颇喜人,而结合具体案例来对证明责任的分配及其原则的研究却并不多见。笔者因是一名司法实践者,故力图剖析一些案例,再参照学者的理论成果,对《证据规定》第七条规定的分配证明责任的原则,加以直观理解,并对影响证明责任承担的有关因素在进行简要阐明,最后将如何分配证明责任的特殊问题,即证明责任的倒置,从中进行总结,或许对有关问题的研究有所帮助。
In the civil procedure jurisprudence of our country, the research articles on how to distribute the burden of proof can be described as the texts along the coast. Since the promulgation and implementation of the “Rules of Evidence”, the research results of the “Evidence Rules” have also been quite satisfactory. Combining the specific cases to prove the responsibility The study of the distribution and its principles is rare. Because the author is a judicial practitioner, he tries hard to analyze some cases, and then refers to the academic achievements of scholars to directly understand the principle of the burden of proof of distribution stipulated in Article 7 of the “Provisions of Evidence” Factors in the brief elucidation, and finally how to assign the burden of proof of the special issue, that is, the burden of proof of the inversion, from which to summarize, may be helpful for the research on the issue.